Spooked: Waverly Hills?

This is in my top 10 of stupidest "documentaries" I've ever seen.

Ask me anything.

-EVP?: possible radio waves
-Hearing someone behind you in tunnel?: anecdotal but also feasibly reverberations from one own's voice, footsteps, and breathing.
All the photos shown?: easily faked
Stories?: Again, anecdotal but with so many inconsistencies even among the "witnesses" in the program itself (e.g., nurse who hung herself--no correct date and even the TAPS team who collected county records didn't find a suicide)

This program was SO overdone it plays quite untrue. The historical evidence and the great pictures of that time period would have been a better presentation. The owners have obvious motives to say/play things up, as do their employees.

Any other personal experiences can easily be chalked up to one's own mind tricks (imagination).

The Ghost Hunters investigation was much better done, and even that is biased, this IS entertainment folks.

It was stupid. They tried to play it up but it wasn't anywhere as well done as Ghost Hunters was. I won't be watching this show anymore, that's for sure!

I think that the problem with most ghost shows is that the investigators go in hoping for something to happen (whether they say it or not). Then they take anything, from a headache to a piece of dust, to be a sign that a ghost is around.

I guess there's just no accounting for taste,cuz I enjoyed it. Sci-Fi Channel entertainment, love it!