Wind Waker?

Am I the only one that thought the wind waker wasn't all that great? It was alright, but I felt it was way too rushed. I mean Nintendo even admitted they took out two or three temples from the game so they could save time and release it on date.

I didn't care for the cartoonish graphics either, but I didn't mind them. I thought it was an excuse to hurry up the game..

The story was pretty bad...
and in a world of water, you would think there would be those sea people there (aren't they called zoroas or something? its been a while since i played).

I beat the game but ended up deleting the file since there was nothing to do afterwards except play in your pajamas.
what do you people think?

WW was great. It takes all the classic from zelda's to an all new game playing. The story was not too bad, actually i liked it. If u have play all the zelda's games u can imagine like a story line. Acording to the game all the hyrule field was underwater (that means all the old world was under all the game) and that happened in 100 or 1000 years i dont remember well. So if that happened few people survived (I guess Zoras didnt) and that's my answer to your question about if all the ppl should have been Zoras.
If you want to play good games from tloz better try the old ones like:tloz: a link to the past, link's awakening (look's bad but this might be the game before WW...). Well that's all good luck

i thought the game was great! the graphics change was unexpected but very refreshing. they might have left some things out,but shouldn't it be about how much fun you get out of a game not how long it takes to beat it? no matter what the game is,some one out there loves it. thats probably the best thing about video games,there's something for everybody.you might say it doesnt't have a high replay factor,but i've always been the type to play a game again just to get all the stuff.i liked it.